Mt Field (2) – Potable Water in Ecuador

June, 2016

(Note: I’ve updated this post in July, 2018, after climbing Mt Tom once again.  I’ve recently completed ascending all 48 4000-footers, and am going up a few again, in different seasons…)

A few days ago I began a new journey here: writing about climbing each of the 48 mountains in New Hampshire that are at least 4000 feet tall and, each time, reflecting a bit on the journey since I joined Peace Corps, 30 years ago: on development, social justice, conflict, experiences along the way, etc.

This series is tracing two long arcs:

  • Climbing all 48 4000-foot mountains in New Hampshire, what is called “peak-bagging” by local climbers.  I’m describing, in words and images, the ascent of each of these peaks – mostly done solo, but sometimes with a friend or two;
  • Working in international development during the MDG era: what was it like in the sector as it boomed, and evolved, from the response to the Ethiopian crisis in the mid-1980’s through to the conclusion of the Millennium Development Goals in 2015.

Over the next months, 47 more posts.

The second of the 48 peaks that I summited was Mt Field, which is just south of Mt Tom. (My hike up Mt Tom was described in the first post of this series.)  I went up both Tom and Field on 10 May 2016, leaving from Crawford Depot, as you can see on the map:

Slide2

The hike over from Mt Tom was pleasant and not too steep.  But I got very nervous as I went, because of the increasing amounts of snow and packed ice on the path.  Unexpected for mid-May!

I had planned to continue on to Mt Willey, another 1.4 mi from Field, but once I was on top of Field, it felt more prudent to give myself as much time as possible to get back down to Crawford Notch; walking along the ice was bad enough, but descending steeply was going to be a challenge.
IMG_6309

So I will get up Mt Willey on another day!

IMG_6314

Neither of these photos show the ice, sadly, but the descent turned out to be every bit as challenging as feared.  However, as I had neared the top of Mt Tom, I found myself on snow and then ice that had been packed by climbers over the winter.  They call these “monorails” – areas of the trail that have been packed down so hard that they don’t melt until late in the season.

Worse: after summiting Mt Field, dropping steeply down the Avalon Trail, I was forced to walk on a long monorail without any way to avoid it – the surrounding forest was too dense.  My feet came out from under me, broke my walking pole, and wrenched my shoulder hanging on to a tree when my feet came out from underneath me.  It’s still sore as I write this.

I made sure to prepare better for the next few climbs, until I was 100% sure that the snow and ice was gone.

*

In my last post, I mentioned that I joined the Peace Corps on Valentine’s Day, 1984, when I flew from Boston to Miami to begin two years of service in Ecuador.   I described Peace Corps training briefly in the last post…

Once I arrived at my posting, in Azogues, capital of Cañar province, I began to oversee the construction of two water projects – in Cochancay (in the lowland area of Cañar province, near La Troncal), and El Tambo, in the highlands.  I was very lucky that I was the only gringo in the province (at least for my first year), and the only Project Engineer other than the provincial head.  So I had a lot to do, lots of responsibility.

I loved it.

Long-time readers of this blog may remember that I wrote about El Tambo two years ago – the tragic story of Noemi Ávarez Quillay, who had died in 2014 while trying to reach the United States.  She had lived near El Tambo.  I was very disturbed to read that,“…in Noemi’s hometown there are clues about the forces at work in her story.  In the district of El Tambo in Cañar province, her maternal grandparents, Mr. Quillay, 57, and María Jesús Guamán, 59, live in an adobe home with no running water…”  Either the water system we built hadn’t lasted, or Noemi lived “in the district” but outside the area served by the system…

But back in 1984, one of the most interesting parts of this project, for me, was that the water source was far away from town (8.8km): a spectacular lake (Culebrillas) with a remote Incan ruin on its banks.  The work crew started by building the captation weir near the lake; they had diverted the Culebrillas river while they built the weir.  From there they worked back down towards town, digging a 1m trench, laying and gluing the PVC pipes, and then covering it all up again.

For many weeks I visited the work site by driving up near the lake and walking several kilometers; later, as they approached El Tambo, it was easier to walk up from town.  I vividly recall wondering at the spectacular beauty of the Andes mountains, that I was hiking in such amazing landscape, and “working”!

We built a simple treatment plant, with a chlorination hut, two slow sand filters, a 100m3 (26,000 gal) water storage tank, over 8km of tubing in the town itself, and 356 household connections.

Here are a few photos of the El Tambo project:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 

*

While technically similar (gravity-flow), the Cochancay project was quite different, mainly because it was on the coast while El Tambo was in the highlands.  Cañar was an unusual province, with extensive mountain and coastal zones.

In those days at least, the culture of coastal Ecuador was very Caribbean, exuberant and loud, extroverted and busy.  El Tambo was primarily indigenous, introverted and sombre.  Stereotypes, of course, but that’s how it felt.

The captation for the Cochancay system was in the jungle, a few kilometers the road from town.  No scenic hiking in the Andes for me on this project!  Driving to Cochancay was always a bit scary, as we dropped down from Azogues, at 2500m above sea level, almost to sea level, and there was almost always heavy, dense fog on the way down.  I saw more than one terrible accident on that road (which was the main highway between Cuenca and Guayaquil).

Here again we built a simple treatment plant, with a chlorination hut, two slow sand filters, a 100m3 water storage tank, over 7km of tubing in the town itself, and 361 household connections.  These two projects were of very similar sizes; one difference was that here in Cochancay, with a much warmer climate, the system was designed to provide 50% more water per person than in El Tambo, up high in the cooler mountains.

Here are a few photos of the Cochancay project:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 

Here I’ve written about helping to bring potable water to two rural communities – and, in fact, in 1990 only 62% of rural Ecuadoreans had access to improved water sources.  So the work we were doing in El Tambo and Cochancay was urgent and important.

But one common thread of these posts will be how much things have changed – mostly for the better – since I began this journey.  In this sense, then, the world has changed: by 2010, nearly 90% of Ecuadoreans living in rural areas had access to improved water sources.

More on that theme – how much the world has changed – in future posts!

*

But first, what did I learn from El Tambo and Cochancay?  So many things!  About the importance of community organization.  About how important it was to charge a nominal fee for water, and increasing marginal costs for more use, to encourage conservation.  And I learned a lot of Cañari Spanish!

But from an engineering point of view, I was also learning.  As a “mechanical” engineer, this was really the first time I had built such large concrete structures, and the two 100m3 tanks we built in El Tambo and Cochancay seemed way over-designed.

In my next post, covering my hike up Mooselauke, I will begin to tell the story of the water system we built in San Rafael – a village across the valley from El Tambo, affected by water-born typhoid, where we built Ecuador’s first ferrocement water tank.  A 70% reduction in cost when compared with the reinforced concrete tanks we built in El Tambo and Conchancay.  And we designed and built a Cretan Sail windmill to pump water for the system.

Stay tuned!

*

Postscript:  I climbed Mt Field again on 19 July, 2018, after having completed all 48 of New Hampshire’s 4000-footers earlier that month; Mt Jefferson was my final climb – stay tuned for my blog about that!

I wondered how it would feel to start the cycle anew – it felt good!  It had been a bit over 2 years since I had climbed Tom and Field, and some things had changed… This time it was mid-summer instead of late spring, so no snow or ice on the ground.  And, this time, I climbed Mt Field first, going around Avalon and A-Z trails clockwise instead of counter-clockwise as I had done in 2016.

It was a spectacular day, clear skies and cool temperatures.  I drove up from Durham, leaving at 7am, arriving at the trail-head in Crawford Notch about 2 1/2 hours later.  Since I had climbed Tom and Field last time, I had established a tradition of stopping for coffee and a Subway sandwich on the way north – which I did this time, too.

It was a beautiful summer day, warm and clear, with great views from the tops.  As I hiked up, I did notice many more tree-falls than I had remembered, perhaps due to the severe storms we had here in March 2018.

In my original article, above, I briefly mentioned having fallen on ice and wrenching my shoulder.  That was descending from Mt Field; this time, going up Mt Field, I came across that area and took a moment to learn my lesson!

I left Crawford Station at 10am, and headed up the Avalon Trail:

IMG_5239

Crawford Station, In Crawford Notch

 

Evidence of high winds, that I don’t remember having seen two years earlier:

IMG_5243

 

After 40 minutes, I came to the junction with the A-Z Trail.  Here I would continue on the Avalon Trail, left, to reach Mt Avalon and then Mt Field.  In 2016 I had gone right here, up to Mt Tom first:

IMG_5244

 

The trail became very steep.  I took one wrong turn near here, in the middle of a big and recent tree blow-down, and had to double back.  Lost 15 minutes or so, and some sweat!

IMG_5247

IMG_5248

Sweating Up The Avalon Trail!

 

At 11:15am I reached the top of Mt Avalon, with fantastic views towards the Presidential Range:

IMG_5249

 

And down Crawford Notch:

IMG_5250

 

And over to Mt Tom, which I would reach after first getting to the top of Mt Field:

IMG_5254

 

Down off of Mt Avalon, I rejoined the Avalon Trail and continued another mile to Mt Field:

IMG_5255

 

The top of Mt Field was crowded, and unremarkable.  There were a couple of groups of parents and young hikers – good to see them up here, but I decided to have half of my lunch nearby rather than at the summit cairn.  Which is surrounded by trees, anyway!

Near the summit there is one view north, towards the Mt Washington Hotel in Bretton Woods.  It was just after noon, and there was another hiker enjoying her lunch:

IMG_5262

 

I had half of my Subway sandwich here, and then got back onto the trail, now moving on the Willey Ridge Trail towards Mt Tom:

IMG_5263

IMG_5265.jpg

 

*

Climbing Mt Field again was great, especially because it was a glorious day. I was able to note where I had fallen last time, on the mid-May snow of 2016, wrenching my shoulder, but generally it was a very peaceful and happy day.

I’m not planning on hiking all 48 of the 4000-footers again, but it might happen!  But as I do hike them, the repeat climbs will be in different seasons (this time, Tom and Field were summer climbs, whereas in 2016 it was springtime), and afterwards I will revisit these articles and add photos from the subsequent climbs, as I did here.

*

Here are links to earlier blogs in this series.  Eventually there will be 48 articles, each one about climbing one of New Hampshire’s 4000-footers, and also reflecting on a career in international development:

  1. Mt Tom (1) – A New Journey;
  2. Mt Field (2) – Potable Water in Ecuador;
  3. Mt Moosilauke (3) – A Water System for San Rafael (part 1);
  4. Mt Flume (4) – A Windmill for San Rafael (part 2);
  5. Mt Liberty (5) – Onward to Colombia, Plan International in Tuluá;
  6. Mt Osceola (6) – Three Years in Tuluá;
  7. East Osceola (7) – Potable Water for Cienegueta;
  8. Mt Passaconaway (8) – The South America Regional Office;
  9. Mt Whiteface (9) – Empowerment!;
  10. North Tripyramid (10) – Total Quality Management for Plan International;
  11. Middle Tripyramid (11) – To International Headquarters!;
  12. North Kinsman (12) – Fighting Fragmentation and Building Unity: New Program Goals and Principles for Plan International;
  13. South Kinsman (13) – A Growth Plan for Plan International;
  14. Mt Carrigain (14) – Restructuring Plan International;
  15. Mt Eisenhower (15) – A Guest Blog: Max van der Schalk Reflects on 5 Years at Plan’s International Headquarters;
  16. Mt Pierce (16) – Four Years At Plan’s International Headquarters;
  17. Mt Hancock (17) – Hanoi, 1998;
  18. South Hancock (18) – Plan’s Team in Viet Nam (1998-2002);
  19. Wildcat “D” Peak (19) – Plan’s Work in Viet Nam;
  20. Wildcat Mountain (20) – The Large Grants Implementation Unit in Viet Nam;
  21. Middle Carter (21) – Things Had Changed;
  22. South Carter (22) – CCF’s Organizational Capacity Assessment and Child Poverty Study;
  23. Mt Tecumseh (23) – Researching CCF’s New Program Approach;
  24. Mt Jackson (24) – The Bright Futures Program Approach;
  25. Mt Isolation (25) – Pilot Testing Bright Futures;
  26. Mt Lincoln (26) – Change, Strategy and Culture: Bright Futures 101;
  27. Mt Lafayette (27) – Collective Action for Human Rights;
  28. Mt Willey (28) – Navigating Principle and Pragmatism, Working With UUSC’s Bargaining Unit;
  29. Cannon Mountain (29) – UUSC Just Democracy;
  30. Carter Dome (30) – A (Failed) Merger In the INGO Sector (1997);
  31. Galehead Mountain (31) – What We Think About When We Think About A Great INGO Program;
  32. Mt Garfield (32) – Building Strong INGO Teams: Clarity, Trust, Inspiration;
  33. Mt Moriah (33) – Putting It All Together (Part 1): the ChildFund Australia International Program Team;
  34. Owls’ Head (34) – Putting It All Together (Part 2): ChildFund Australia’s Theory of Change;
  35. Bondcliff (35) – ChildFund Australia’s Development Effectiveness System;
  36. West Bond (36) – “Case Studies” in ChildFund Australia’s Development Effectiveness System;
  37. Mt Bond (37) – Impact Assessement in ChildFund Australia’s Development Effectiveness System;
  38. Mt Waumbek (38) – “Building the Power of Poor People and Poor Children …”

 

41 thoughts on “Mt Field (2) – Potable Water in Ecuador

  1. Pingback: Mt Moosilauke (3) – A Water System for San Rafael (part 1) | Mark McPeak

  2. Pingback: Mt Flume (4) – A Windmill for San Rafael (part 2) | Mark McPeak

  3. Pingback: Mt Liberty (5) – Onward to Colombia, Plan International in Tuluá | Mark McPeak

  4. Pingback: Mt Osceola (6) – Three Years in Tuluá | Mark McPeak

  5. Pingback: East Osceola (7) – Potable Water for Cienegueta | Mark McPeak

  6. Pingback: Mt Passaconaway (8) – The South American Regional Office (SARO) | Mark McPeak

  7. Pingback: Mt Whiteface (9) – Empowerment! | Mark McPeak

  8. Pingback: North Tripyramid (10) – Total Quality Management for Plan International | Mark McPeak

  9. Pingback: Middle Tripyramid (11) – To International Headquarters! | Mark McPeak

  10. Pingback: North Kinsman (12) – Fighting Fragmentation and Building Unity: New Program Goals and Principles for Plan International | Mark McPeak

  11. Pingback: South Kinsman (13) – A Growth Plan for Plan International | Mark McPeak

  12. Pingback: Mt Carrigain (14) – Restructuring Plan International | Mark McPeak

  13. Pingback: Mt Eisenhower (15) – A Guest Blog: Max van der Schalk Reflects on 5 Years at Plan’s International Headquarters | Mark McPeak

  14. Pingback: Mt Pierce (16) – Four Years At Plan’s International Headquarters | Mark McPeak

  15. Pingback: Mt Hancock (17) – Hanoi, 1998 | Mark McPeak

  16. Pingback: South Hancock (18) – Plan’s Team in Viet Nam (1998-2002) | Mark McPeak

  17. Pingback: Wildcat “D” Peak (19) – Plan’s Work in Viet Nam | Mark McPeak

  18. Pingback: Wildcat Mountain (20) – The Large Grants Implementation Unit in Viet Nam | Mark McPeak

  19. Pingback: Mt Tom (1) – A New Journey | Mark McPeak

  20. Pingback: Middle Carter (21) – Things Had Changed | Mark McPeak

  21. Pingback: South Carter (22) – CCF’s Organizational Capacity Assessment and Child Poverty Study | Mark McPeak

  22. Pingback: Mt Tecumseh (23) – Researching CCF’s New Program Approach | Mark McPeak

  23. Pingback: Mt Jackson (24) – The Bright Futures Program Approach | Mark McPeak

  24. Pingback: Mt Isolation (25) – Pilot-Testing Bright Futures | Mark McPeak

  25. Pingback: Mt Lincoln (26) – Change, Strategy and Culture: Bright Futures 101. | Mark McPeak

  26. Pingback: Mt Lafayette (27) – Collective Action for Human Rights | Mark McPeak

  27. Pingback: Mt Willey (28) – Navigating Principle And Pragmatism, Working With UUSC’s Bargaining Unit | Mark McPeak

  28. Pingback: Cannon Mountain (29) – UUSC Just Democracy | Mark McPeak

  29. Pingback: Carter Dome (30) – A (Failed) Merger In the INGO Sector (1997) | Mark McPeak

  30. Pingback: Galehead Mountain (31) – What We Think About When We Think About A Great INGO Program | Mark McPeak

  31. Pingback: Mt Garfield (32) – Building Strong INGO Teams: Clarity, Trust, Inspiration | Mark McPeak

  32. Pingback: Why Activism? Inspiration from Ta-Nehisi Coates | Mark McPeak

  33. Pingback: Mt Moriah (33) – Putting It All Together (Part 1): the ChildFund Australia International Program Team | Mark McPeak

  34. Pingback: Owl’s Head (34) – Putting It All Together (Part 2): ChildFund Australia’s Theory of Change | Mark McPeak

  35. Pingback: Bondcliff (35) – ChildFund Australia’s Development Effectiveness Framework | Mark McPeak

  36. Pingback: Mt Bond (36) – “Case Studies” In ChildFund Australia’s Development Effectiveness Framework | Mark McPeak

  37. Pingback: West Bond (37) – Impact Assessment in ChildFund Australia’s Development Effectiveness Framework | Mark McPeak

  38. Pingback: Mt Waumbek (38) – “Building the Power of Poor People and Poor Children…” | Mark McPeak

  39. Pingback: North Twin (40) – Value for Money | Mark McPeak

  40. Pingback: South Twin (41) – Disaster Risk Reduction | Mark McPeak

  41. Pingback: Mt Hale (42) – A “Golden Age” for INGOs Has Passed. What Next? | Mark McPeak

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.